Today, SlingPlayer for the iPhone was released—with one little caveat:
“Slingbox, which would use large amounts of wireless network capacity, could create congestion and potentially prevent other customers from using the network. The application does not run on our 3G wireless network. Applications like this, which redirect a TV signal to a personal computer, are specifically prohibited under our terms of service. We consider smartphones like the iPhone to be personal computers in that they have the same hardware and software attributes as PCs.
That said, we don’t restrict users from going to a Web site that lets them view videos. But what our terms and conditions prohibit is the transferring, or slinging, of a TV signal to their personal computer or smartphone.
The Slingbox application for the iPhone runs on WiFi. That’s good news for AT&T’s iPhone 3G customers, who get free WiFi access at our 20,000 owned and operated hot spots in the U.S., including Starbucks, McDonalds, Barnes & Noble, hotels, and airports. AT&T is the industry leader in WiFi.”
— AT&T
So, streaming video is okay, so long as it’s not TV…
Realistically, how many iPhone owners also own Slingboxes? I’d say 1% or less. Now, how many iPhone owners watch YouTube videos on their phone? I’d say the majority of them.
Considering they allow SlingPlayer for their BlackBerry and Windows Mobile phones; isn’t AT&T being more than a little hypocritical here?
I pay $30 a month for—what they call—unlimited data usage. How is this in any way, shape or form unlimited?
Hey internet providers, I’ve got some advice for you:
YOU ARE A DUMB PIPE. SHUT THE FUCK UP AND PROVIDE US INTERNET WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS.
NO THROTTLING. NO TRAFFIC SHAPING. NO CAPS. NO TIERS.
With what we pay each month for internet access, they have no excuses as to why their networks are in such piss-poor shape. None.
3 years ago